Legal Opinion

Malott v. Randall

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 3, 1974No. 42759PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

A stockholder’s suit was started by. Thomas Malott who owned stock in the Hecla Mining Company. Emil Heber, also a stockholder, intervened and is the appellant.

The trial court found against plaintiff and appellant. The matter of signing findings of fact, conclusions of law, and judgment of dismissal was noted for July 5, 1972. On that day the matter regularly came before the court and all counsel were present, including Mr. Robert A. Southwell, then counsel for plaintiff and plaintiff-intervenor.

*260After discussion by court and counsel, changes were made in the findings of fact by…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Brown v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1939
  3. Quareles v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Stanley v. Board of AppealsNew York Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Grip v. Buffelen Woodworking Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. North Street Ass'n v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Narrowsview Preservation Ass'n v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. EkangerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. DGHI, ENTERPRISES v. Pacific Cities, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1999

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API