Legal Opinion

Hinkle v. Cravens

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 14, 1966PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Special Justice William J. Harbison

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case is before the Court on stipulated facts. The sole question involved is whether a corporate officer is immune from service of process while attending court in a county other than that of his residence, in order to testify on behalf of the corporation.

According to the stipulation filed, the three defendants in error, on and prior to May 21, 1965, were residents and citizens of Cumberland County, Tennessee. On that date the defendant in error Hassell Ray York was secretary-treasurer of the Cumberland Loan &…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Boll v. WeinsteinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  2. Sofge v. LoweTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Purnell v. Morton Live Stock Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Cotton v. FrazierTennessee Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Sewanee Coal, Coke & Land Co. v. W. W. Williams & Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1907

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Beckham v. JohnsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API