Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Frost

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Fayette County

Decided December 30, 1941No. 64Published

1Opinion of the Court

Carr, J.,

Petitioner, against whom judgment was confessed upon a mortgage bond, obtained this rule to show cause why the judgment should not be opened in order to permit a recoupment of damages from plaintiff for a breach of contract, the performance of which was a part of the consideration for the mortgage debt.

On November 20, 1939, Henry J. Cooper, a heating contractor doing business as Henry J. Cooper Company, proposed in writing to install in a dwelling house at 40 Barton Mill Road in South Union Township, owned by Ruth J. Frost, defendant, a winter air-conditioning system according to the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holland Furnace Co. v. NauracajIndiana Court of Appeals · 1938
  2. Beaty v. BordwellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1880
  3. Barabe v. Duhrkop Oven Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1919
  4. Stroud's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1885
  5. Plympton Cabinet Co. v. RosenbergSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API