Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Moore

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 7, 1985PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DEL SOLE, Judge:

The following issues are presented for our review: 1) Whether Appellant should have been charged and convicted of retail theft, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3929, instead of theft, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3921, and receiving stolen property, 18 Pa.C.S. § 3925; and 2) Whether there was sufficient evidence to convict for third degree felony robbery as defined in 18 Pa.C.S. § 3701(a)(l)(v). For the following reasons, Appellant’s conviction for robbery is reversed and the case is remanded to the trial court for resentencing on Appellant’s remaining convictions.

The facts in the instant case are undisputed.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BoernerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Commonwealth v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. DuncanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Commonwealth v. ColemanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ShambergerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  2. Commonwealth v. WestcottSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. LloydSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  4. Com. v. McCollum, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
  5. Com. v. Williams, J.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API