Legal Opinion

Addams-More v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 14, 2007No. 07-649CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HEWITT, Judge.

I. Background

Before the court is Plaintiffs Rule 40.3 Recusal Motion Against Judge Hewitt to Prevent Bias ... Conflict of Interest (Motion to Recuse). Attached to the Motion to Re-cuse is a letter to plaintiff dated September *5794, 2007 from the Clerk of the Court on which plaintiff has typed a response to the Clerk of the Court. The Motion to Recuse states, in full:

Plaintiff is concerned about bias in her ease because the assigned judge has already dismissed another case (of plaintiff) pending in the district court, wherein plaintiff was constrained under the rules of notice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. C.A. Brokaw v. Mercer County, James Brokaw, Weir BrokawCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  4. George C. Hook v. The Honorable Joe Billy McDade Judge, United States District Court for the Central District of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. Hewlett-Packard Company, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Bausch & Lomb IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Shell Oil Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
  2. Allen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Shell Oil Company and Atlantic Richfield Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API