Legal Opinion
In Re Feigenbaum
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided June 26, 2008No. 07-BG-131PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
In this reciprocal disciplinary proceeding against respondent Frank Feigenbaum, 1 a member of the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has recommended to this court that reciprocal discipline be imposed in the form of a five-year suspension, with a requirement to prove fitness as a condition of reinstatement. No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed.
On November 19, 1999, the Supreme Court of the State of California (“California Court”) suspended respondent for six months, but stayed execution in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re SpannDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998
- In Re ChildressDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
- In Re MeislerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
- In Re ReisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2005
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In re Sherryl V.R.S. Goffer a/k/a Sherryl Snodgrass CaffeyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015