Legal Opinion

Wellington Oil Co. v. Maffi

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1941No. 7745PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Judge Hickman,

of the Commission of Appeals, delivered the opinion for the Court.

Nick A. Maffi was plaintiff in the trial court and Wellington Oil Company of Delaware, hereinafter sometimes called Wellington, and John T. O’Neil, its president, were defendants. Upon a verdict returned in obedience to a peremptory instruction, judgment was rendered in the trial court that plaintiff take nothing. That judgment was reversed by the Court of Civil Appeals and the case remanded. 138 S. W. (2d) 134. In view of the instructed verdict, the Court of Civil Appeals in its opinion very properly stated…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Colbert v. Dallas Joint Stock Land BankTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Teagarden v. R. B. Godley Lumber Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1913
  3. The Texas Loan Agency v. TaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Kennedy v. McMullenCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. W. M. W. N.W. Ry. Co. v. WoodTexas Supreme Court · 1895

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. La Sara Grain Co. v. First National Bank of MercedesTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Seven Elves, Incorporated v. Jack S. EskenaziCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  4. City of Fort Worth v. PippenTexas Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Pan Eastern Exploration Co. v. Hufo OilsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API