Legal Opinion

Cyr v. Cyr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 12, 1991No. 65,400PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is a post-divorce action by Goldie Cyr to enforce child support and alimony judgments. The appellant, Darrell Cyr, contends the judgments are void due to the passage of time.

The facts are not in dispute. Goldie and Darrell Cyr were divorced in 1964. Goldie was granted custody of the children and Darrell was ordered to pay $35 a week, commencing April 13, 1964, for child support, and $2,500 in alimony, at $25 a month, beginning April 27, 1964. The court order to pay alimony expired in July 1972.

The last execution to collect past due child…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Pork Motel, Corp. v. Kansas Department of Health & EnvironmentSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Watkins v. HartsockSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  4. In Re Petition of City of MoranSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  5. Hendrix v. Consolidated Van Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1954

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. McCarthy v. City of LeawoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  2. Kansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Reimer & Koger Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. Alpha Medical Clinic v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
  4. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  5. First Page, Inc. v. CunninghamSupreme Court of Kansas · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API