Legal Opinion

United States v. Youssef

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided November 5, 2008No. 07-10335PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Per curiam

Magdi Youssef appeals his conviction for making a false statement in an immigration document in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1015(a). 1 We are called upon to decide whether violation of § 1015(a) requires the false statement to be “material” as an element of the offense. We hold that it does not, and affirm Youssef s conviction.

I. Factual and Procedural Background

Youssef, a citizen of Egypt, was admitted to the United States on a six-month visitor visa on February 4, 1999. On August 6, 1999, Youssefs authorization to stay in the United States was extended to February 3, 2000. Notwithstanding,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Neder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Kungys v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. United States v. WellsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. United States v. MincoffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  3. Darren Bottinelli v. Josias SalazarCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
  4. Desire, LLC v. Manna Textiles, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. GallegosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API