Legal Opinion
United States v. Gallegos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 30, 2010No. 07-30199, 07-30212PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOSMAN, District Judge:
Defendant-appellant Ernesto Gallegos appeals his two criminal sentences, imposed at the same time for separate offenses. The sentences arose from Mr. Gallegos’s entry of two guilty pleas — one for illegal reentry, and the other for escape while awaiting sentencing on the first charge. On appeal, Mr. Gallegos argues that the district court’s imposition of a partially concurrent and partially consecutive sentence for the escape charge violates 18 U.S.C. § 3584. He also argues that the district court’s refusal to offer a reduction for acceptance of responsibility on…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. Alfred Arnold AmelineCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. StoterauCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. VizcarraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Paul Torres, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- State of Arizona v. Tohono O'Odham NationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Ashley Judd v. Harvey WeinsteinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.