Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Concurrence by Judge Berzon
OPINION
MURGIA, Circuit Judge:
Under California’s consumer protection laws, a consumer who pays extra for a falsely labeled or advertised product may recover the premium she paid for that product. California law also permits that consumer to seek a court order requiring the manufacturer of the product to halt its false advertising. California has decided that its consumers have a right, while shopping in a store selling consumer goods, to rely upon the statements made on a product’s packaging. Today, we hold that California consumers who can seek in California state…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- Hennessy v. Infinity Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.