Legal Opinion

Jennifer Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 20, 2017No. 15-16173PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Concurrence by Judge Berzon

OPINION

MURGIA, Circuit Judge:

Under California’s consumer protection laws, a consumer who pays extra for a falsely labeled or advertised product may recover the premium she paid for that product. California law also permits that consumer to seek a court order requiring the manufacturer of the product to halt its false advertising. California has decided that its consumers have a right, while shopping in a store selling consumer goods, to rely upon the statements made on a product’s packaging. Today, we hold that California consumers who can seek in California state…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  2. Cafasso v. General Dynamics C4 Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Daniels-Hall v. National Education Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. Kearns v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Zucco Partners, LLC v. Digimarc Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Davidson v. Kimberly-Clark Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  2. In re Nexus 6P Prods. Liab. Litig.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  3. In re Chrysler-Dodge-Jeep Ecodiesel Mktg.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. Townsend v. Monster Beverage Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
  5. Hennessy v. Infinity Ins. Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2019

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API