Migliore v. Livingston Financial, LLC
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Justice PARRISH,
opinion of the Court:
INTRODUCTION
11 On certiorari, petitioner Charles Migl-iore argues that the court of appeals erred when it held that it lacked jurisdiction to consider his challenge to the district court's denial of his renewed rule 60(b) motion due to his failure to file a timely notice of appeal. Mr. Migliore also argues that the court of appeals erred in affirming the district court's award of attorney fees pursuant to section 78B-5-825 of the Utah Code.
[ 2 We hold that the court of appeals erred when it concluded that it lacked jurisdiction to review the district…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United Student Aid Funds, Inc. v. EspinosaSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Valcarce v. FitzgeraldUtah Supreme Court · 1998
- Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. Hon. BoydenUtah Supreme Court · 2019
- Pinder v. DuchesneUtah Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. GaileyUtah Supreme Court · 2016
- Elite Legacy Corporation v. SchvaneveldtCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2016
- Fadel v. Deseret First Credit UnionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.