Legal Opinion

In re Lockitt

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1908PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Applications for peremptory writs of mandamus.

1Opinion of the CourtCarr, J.

Shortly prior to 1906, the city of Hew York, through its hoard of estimate and apportionment, proceeded under the provisions of its charter to widen Livingston street in the borough of Brooklyn. According to the resolution of its board of estimate and apportionment, the expenses of the improvement were to be borne in the proportion of seventy-five per centum by the city at large-and twenty-five per centum by the property deemed to be benefited. Proceedings were instituted in this court on the part of the city to acquire the lands necessary for the improvement, to determine the ex*7pense…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. In re the City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  3. Matter of City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  4. People ex rel. Fitch v. LordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. People ex rel. Lucey v. MolloyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Vandeweghe v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Pardee v. RayfieldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. In re the Estate of MurrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API