Matter of City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
Appeal, hy permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made January 25, 1901, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating an order appointing commissioners of estimate and assessment in the proposed widening of Clinton avenue in the borough of Brooklyn. The following are the questions certified: • First.
Read the full summary
Appeal, hy permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made January 25, 1901, which reversed an order of Special Term vacating an order appointing commissioners of estimate and assessment in the proposed widening of Clinton avenue in the borough of Brooklyn. The following are the questions certified: • First. Is the act entitled “ An act in relation to Clinton avenue in the borough of Brooklyn in the city of New York,” and known as chapter 257 of the Laws of 1899, in violation of section 16, article 3 of the Constitution ? .…
1Opinion of the Court
Order affirmed, with costs. The first question certified answered in the negative and the second question in the affirmative; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Bartlett, Haight, Vann, Lardón, Cullen and Werner JJ.
2Cited by17 opinions
- Denihan Enterprises, Inc. v. O'DwyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Ayer v. Commissioners on Height of BuildingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
- In re YarasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Bunyan v. Commissioners of Palisades Interstate ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Mead v. TurnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.