Legal Opinion

Lizotte v. Praxair, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided March 3, 2009No. Case C07-1868RSLPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO STRIKE AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN LI-MINE

ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.

I.INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on two motions: defendant Praxair’s motion to strike a report prepared by Rimkus Consulting Group, Inc. (Dkt.# 51) and plaintiffs motion in limine to admit the report (Dkt.# 55). For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants defendant’s motion to strike and denies plaintiffs motion in limine. 1

II.BACKGROUND

Plaintiff was driving a truck for Pacific CA Systems, Inc. (“Pacific”), a trucking company that had a contract to haul a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bourjaily v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Luce v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Karen Sue Morris v. State of California Ventura County Municipal Court Attorney General of the State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  4. Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  5. United States v. Warren S. ChangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Durham v. County of MauiDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2011
  2. Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.District Court, D. Delaware · 2018
  3. Alaska Air Group Inc v. Anthem IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
  4. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc. v. Anthem IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024
  5. JetBlue Airways Corporation v. Anthem IncDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API