Legal Opinion
Pernix Ir. Pain Dac v. Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided June 8, 2018No. Civil Action No. 16–139–WCBPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM C. BRYSON, UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
In this order, the Court addresses a dispute between the parties over the admissibility of certain exhibits that the plaintiffs (collectively, "Pernix") intend to offer at trial. Defendant Alvogen Malta Operations Ltd. ("Alvogen") contends that the materials are inadmissible as hearsay. Pernix argues that the materials in dispute are non-hearsay and can be used to cross-examine Alvogen's witnesses.
A. The Admissibility of Alvogen's Expert Witness Reports Against Alvogen
The principal issue before the Court involves the admissibility of five exhibits…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- H. E. Collins and Joetta Collins, Surviving Parents and Personal Representatives of Karen Collins, Deceased v. Wayne CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Richard M. Lippay v. Dean C. Christos Commonwealth of Pa. Dean C. ChristosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Kirk v. Raymark Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Phillips v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Wright-Simmons v. City of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Genentech, Inc. v. Biogen MA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Mountain Valley Pipeline, LLC v. 1.40 Acres of Land, Owned by Mary Ellen RivesDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Stanley v. Denver Mattress Co., LLC (TV1)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024