Legal Opinion
United States v. Warren S. Chang
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 4, 2000No. 97-50518PublishedCited by 53 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge:
Warren H.S. Chang appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy, uttering a counterfeit foreign obligation and possessing a counterfeit foreign obligation. On appeal, Chang challenges certain evi-dentiary rulings made by the district court, contends that the evidence presented against him at trial was insufficient to sustain part of his conviction and argues that the sentence imposed by the district court is illegal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742. We affirm the conviction but vacate Chang’s sentence and remand for…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. James E. KESSI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. William L. Scholl, United States of America v. William L. SchollCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Melvin Frank SchaffCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by53 opinions
- Levin v. Dalva Brothers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Jay R. Bishop, United States of America v. Gene R. CardenazCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Cobbins v. Tennessee Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. BondsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.