Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Eastman Kodak Co.
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 14, 1995No. 1: CV-93-840PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
McCLURE, District Judge.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff George W. Mitchell filed this ERISA action 1 to recover long-term disability benefits which he alleges are owed to him under the Kodak Long Term Disability Plan (the plan) provided by his former employer, defendant Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak). Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (Metropolitan Life) is the claims administrator responsible for making eligibility determinations in the first instance. Its decisions are reviewed by Kodak, the plan administrator.
Mitchell was employed by Kodak from June 4, 1972 through January 12, 1989 as a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- James R. WHITE, Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
- Elizabeth L. Cohen v. Secretary of Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 20 Employee Benefits Cas. 1375, 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4487, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7305, Pens. Plan Guide P 23921c Gloria Snow v. Standard Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Rizzo v. Paul Revere Insurance GroupDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1996
- Foley v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local Union 98 Pension FundDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- United States v. SclafaniDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- Vaughn v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.