Legal Opinion
United States v. Vincent Earl Waites
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 4, 2000No. 99-30037PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge:
The question for decision is whether the federal Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13(a), as interpreted by the teachings of Lewis v. United States, 523 U.S. 155, 118 S.Ct. 1135, 140 L.Ed.2d 271 (1998), permits application of the Oregon criminal trespass statute to certain conduct committed within a U.S. Post Office. Appellant Vincent Earl Waites contends that his conviction and sentence for misdemeanor violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 7(3), 13, trespass in a federal facility, were infirm because the magistrate judge invoked the Assimilative Crimes Act and applied the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Tierney v. KupersCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Johnson v. Yellow Cab Transit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Franklin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- United States v. RochaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Wilfredo LopezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. Victor Reza-RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- United States v. Roblero-SolisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Robert K. Souza, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.