Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Rose

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 30, 1989No. 60,000; CM 8701098PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

SULLIVAN, Judge:

In April and May 1987, appellant was tried by general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members at Fort Carson, Colorado. Contrary to his pleas, he was found guilty of intentional infliction of grievous bodily harm, in violation of Article 128, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 928. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 3 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved the sentence as adjudged. The Court of Military Review affirmed the findings and sentence…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Tatum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1951
  2. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  3. United States v. WatkinsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. RegaladoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. OwensUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. CurtisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. BarnesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994
  3. United States v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. FlanniganUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  5. United States v. MarksUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API