Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Kennady

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 3, 1921No. 9700. [fn*]PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; Ben M. Terrell, Judge. Action by M. H. Kennady against J. Burris Mitchell. From' a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtConner, C. J.

The appellee, M. H. Ken-nad'y, sued appellant, J. Burris Mitchell, in the Sixty-Seventh district court of Tarrant county to recover upon an alleged contract to pay commissions. The plaintiff, as Ken-nady will hereinafter be referred to, alleged, in substance, that in January, 1919, he had been employed by E. F. Ritchey and G-. R. Ritchey, brothers, to secure for them a “drilling contract” on 220 acres of land situated in Stephens county; that it was understood that the Ritcheys were not to pay an$ commission, but that the plaintiff was to secure commission for his services in the matter from…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. ElmenTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Nugent v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  3. Hales v. PetersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Myers v. . DeanNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Lungerhausen v. CrittendenMichigan Supreme Court · 1894

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kleck v. KleckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Long Bell Lumber Co. v. FutchCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Bierschwale v. OakesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  4. Johnson v. EdringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API