Legal Opinion
Gardner v. Murphy
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 31, 1975No. Civ. 46408PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, Acting P. J.
Cross-complainant, Philip Gardner, appeals from a judgment of dismissal (Code Civ. Proc., § 581c) of his cross-action for indemnity and contribution against certain codefendants in the main action for rescission and damages, namely, Virginia Murphy, et al., 1 following the sustaining, without leave to amend, of their general demurrers to his first amended cross-complaint. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 904.1, subd. (a).) 2
The fundamental question presented is whether the conduct of Gardner, the sole real estate salesman actively involved as an intermediary in…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Biakanja v. IrvingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
- Herrero v. AtkinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962
- DeHaas v. Empire Petroleum CompanyDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1968
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Sacramento v. Gemsch Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- In Re All Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1984
- Baird v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.