Legal Opinion
In Re All Asbestos Cases
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided November 23, 1984No. Civ. 79-0382, et alPublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
TASHIMA, District Judge,
Sitting by Designation.
This is the motion of third-party defendant United States to dismiss the third-party complaints. The first of these was filed by defendant Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc., in December 1981. Similar complaints were later filed by defendants Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., and Flexitallic Gasket Company, Inc. (collectively “third-party plaintiffs” or “manufacturers”). The government’s motion is supported by plaintiffs.
The third-party complaints derive from the approximately 90 consolidated…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Dalehite v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- United States v. S.A. Empresa De Viacao Aerea Rio GrandenseSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- LaBarge v. County of MariposaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Johns-Manville Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
- In Re ALL MAINE ASBESTOS LITIGATION (PNS CASES). Petition of UNITED STATES of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Palmroy P.K. Bush v. Eagle-Picher Industries, Inc., Defendant-Third-Party v. United States of America, Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Lopez v. Johns ManvilleDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.