Legal Opinion

City of Sacramento v. Gemsch Investment Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 1981No. Civ. 18751PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

CECCHETTINI, J.*

The briefs of all parties show no significant factual dispute for the purposes of this appeal.

The appellant, City of Sacramento (City), appeals from judgments granting separate motions of respondents Gemsch Investment Company, Vandenberg Motors, and ABC Supply Inc., for summary judgment. The motions were coordinated and based on essentially the same grounds and facts.

The plaintiff, Minnie M. Myers, slipped on some droppings (date palm nuts or seeds) on a sidewalk on the east side of 28th Street between J and K Streets in the City of Sacramento, on January 29, 1977, and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Motorcycle Assn. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Nest-KartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Panopulos v. MaderisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Cahill Bros., Inc. v. Clementina Co.California Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Mesler v. Bragg Management Co.California Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Far West Financial Corp. v. D & S CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Easton v. StrassburgerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  4. GEM Developers v. Hallcraft Homes of San Diego, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Seeley v. SeymourCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API