Legal Opinion

Lemper v. City of Dubuque

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 15, 1946No. 46885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBliss, J.

There is no controversy about the facts. They are, in substance, as we here state them. Plaintiff was the duly appointed and qualified police matron of defendant and performed all of the duties of said office from August 1, 1940, to May 31, 1945. Prior to and during said period section 5667, Code, 1939 (section 363.41, Code, 1946), was in effect and provided as follows:

“Compensation of matrons. Police matrons shall receive not less in any case than the minimum salary paid to policemen in the city in which they are appointed.”

During said period the defendant failed and refused to comply with…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. ætna Life Ins. Co. v. KeplerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
  2. Holcomb v. BoyntonIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Johnson County Savings Bank v. City of CrestonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  4. Salley v. McCoySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
  5. Coggeshall v. City of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hart v. WorthingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  2. Alexander v. RandallSupreme Court of Iowa · 1965
  3. Ostraum v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API