Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 7, 2004No. 1327-03PublishedCited by 529 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

OPINION

2Opinion of the Court · KeaslerKeasler, J.

The order deferring adjudication of Ronald Taylor’s guilt contained a fine of $300, which the judge orally pronounced at that time. Later, when Taylor’s guilt was adjudicated, the judge did not orally pronounce a fine but included the $300 fine within the written judgment. While this action would be permissible in a case involving regular probation, we conclude that the fine must be deleted in this case because of the unique circumstances of deferred adjudication.

Facts and Procedural History

Taylor was charged with sexual assault. After a jury was selected, he pleaded guilty pursuant to…

3Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Vidaurri v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2001
  2. Ex Parte MaddingCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2002
  3. McNew v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2003
  5. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by529 opinions

  1. United States v. Mondragon-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  2. Armstrong v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
  3. Coronel, Israel v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2013
  4. Beedy v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2008
  5. Burt, Lemuel CarlCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2013

524 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API