Legal Opinion

United States v. Alfred Catino and Thomas Pagano

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 19, 1968No. 31991_1PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

The indictment in this case filed November 2, 1966 charged violations of the narcotics laws in two substantive and one conspiracy count. Count one alleged that Alfred Catino and Frank Fimmano received, concealed, sold and facilitated the concealment, transportation and sale of illegally imported heroin on June 13, 1966 in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173 and 174. Count two charged Thomas Pagano and Frank Fimmano of a like offense on August 31, 1966. The third or conspiracy count charged all three of conspiring to commit the substantive offenses. Fimmano pleaded guilty,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Kwong Hai Chew v. ColdingSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  3. Lutwak v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  5. Hopt v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1887

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. United States v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  2. People v. WindhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United States v. Bobby G. SealeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972
  4. Don Garriga Chapman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. David Ross MileyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API