Nolan v. City of Milford
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
2Per curiam
The plaintiffs, John P. Nolan and Laurel Dixon-Nolan, owners of real property in Milford, appealed to the Superior Court from the tax assessment oftheir property pursuant to General Statutes § 12-117a, claiming that their property was overassessed. After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court agreed with the plaintiffs that the property had been overassessed and adjusted the assessment from the initial value of $2,546,700, set by the tax assessor for the defendant city of Milford, to $2,066,880. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiffs any overpayment on the basis of…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Balf Co. v. Spera Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Gianetti v. MeszorosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Grolier, Inc. v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
4Cited by1 opinion
- Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020