Legal Opinion

Nolan v. City of Milford

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided January 11, 2005No. AC 24957PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The plaintiffs, John P. Nolan and Laurel Dixon-Nolan, owners of real property in Milford, appealed to the Superior Court from the tax assessment oftheir property pursuant to General Statutes § 12-117a, claiming that their property was overassessed. After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court agreed with the plaintiffs that the property had been overassessed and adjusted the assessment from the initial value of $2,546,700, set by the tax assessor for the defendant city of Milford, to $2,066,880. The court ordered the defendant to pay the plaintiffs any overpayment on the basis of…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. STRORINEY v. Crescent Lake Tax DistrictSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Board of Tax ReviewSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. Balf Co. v. Spera Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
  4. Gianetti v. MeszorosSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  5. Grolier, Inc. v. City of DanburyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Georges v. OB-GYN Services, P.C.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API