Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

A. H. Belo & Co. v. Looney

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 13, 1922No. 2909PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice McCARTNEY

This case comes to this Court upon a certificate of dissent from the Court of Civil Appeals for the Sixth District.

Appellee sued to recover damages on account of certain publications in the Galveston Daily News and the Dallas Morning News concerning two suits instituted by him while serving as Attorney General. The first three publications are short and will be copied in full. The last three are lengthy and we will shorten the opinion by stating briefly the substance of portions thereof and quoting only the most important parts thereof:

“I. Editorial, published March 8, 1913.
“A careful reading…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Guisti v. Galveston TribuneTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  3. Negley v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
  4. Schomberg v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Guisti v. Galveston TribuneTexas Supreme Court · 1912

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bentley v. BuntonTexas Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Denton Publishing Company v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Fitzjarrald v. Panhandle Publishing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1950
  5. General Motors Acceptance Corporation v. HowardTexas Supreme Court · 1972

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API