Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Clisby

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 30, 1903PublishedCited by 53 opinions

Action for libel. Before Judge Hodges. City court of Macon. April 6, 1903.

1Opinion of the CourtCobb, J.

Holmes brought an action against Clisby for libel. The allegations of the petition were in substance as follows: Holmes and the firm of which the defendant was a member were the only merchants in the city of Macon engaged in the sale of a brand of ladies’ shoes known as “ Queen Quality.” The regular price of this shoe was three dollars, but the plaintiff, having a quantity of the shoes on hand which were not selling as rapidly as he desired, advertised in the local newspapers that he would sell the genuine Queen Quality shoes at $2.65. These shoes had been bought from the manufacturers as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Behre v. National Cash Register Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  2. Park & Iverson v. Piedmont & Arlington Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  3. Colvard v. BlackSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  4. Pearce v. BrowerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  5. Augusta Evening News v. RadfordSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Pavesich v. New England Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Atlanta Journal Co. v. DoyalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
  3. Sheftall v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Holmes v. ClisbySupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Atlanta News Publishing Co. v. MedlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API