Legal Opinion
City of Bremerton v. Widell
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 6, 2002No. 67451-5PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— Karl Widell and Larry Blunt were each convicted in separate jury trials in Bremerton Municipal Court of multiple counts of second degree criminal trespass. The convictions were based on violations of the Bremerton Housing Authority’s (BHA) antitrespassing policy, in place at BHA’s Westpark facility. See Bremerton Municipal Code (BMC) 9A.36.150; RCW 9A.52.080. The cases were consolidated for appeal, culminating in affirmance by the Kitsap County Superior Court. We accepted direct review and affirm four of the convictions and reverse four.
*565FACTS
The BHA was established to provide affordable,…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pierce v. Society of SistersSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Rode v. DellarcipreteCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Loving v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- American Legion Post 149 v. WASH. DEPT. OF HEALTHWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- American Legion Post No. 149 v. Department of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2008
- Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Bremerton v. WidellWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Ongom v. Dept. of HealthWashington Supreme Court · 2006
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.