Continental Insurance Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Concurrence
BOOCHEVER, Chief Justice,
concurring, with whom DIMOND, Justice Pro Tem., joins.
I find that I must file a separate concurrence on an issue which at first glance might appear to be a relatively minor portion of the majority opinion. The court holds that a trial court may exercise its discretion as to whether or not to award attorney’s fees to a plaintiff who has received and rejected an offer of judgment, for the period of time between the filing of the case and the date of the offer. I believe that the majority unnecessarily injects an area of uncertainty into the application of Civil Rule 68…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- City of Anchorage v. ScaveniusAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Owen Jones & Sons, Inc. v. CR Lewis CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Jakoski v. HollandAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
- Hoffmeister v. McIntoshWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
- Hoffmeister v. McIntoshWyoming Supreme Court · 1961
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.