Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Duke

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 23, 1966No. 19,582PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

Quinn, Chief Judge:

A general court-martial convicted the accused of two specifications of attempted arson at Naselle Air Force Station, Washington, in violation of Article 80 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 880. The convening authority and a board of *461review affirmed the findings of guilty. As modified on review, the sentence includes confinement at hard labor for four years and a dishonorable discharge. We granted further review to consider two allegations of error as to specification 2.

In part, specification 2 alleges the accused willfully and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SweeneyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  2. People v. NagyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. United States v. MargelonyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  4. United States v. DuckworthUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1963
  5. United States v. SchueringUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. ScobyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. HolcombUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. United States v. DeshaUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  4. United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  5. United States v. KoppU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API