Legal Opinion

United States v. Scoby

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided June 26, 1978No. 30,747; CM 432066PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COOK, Judge:

In material part, Article 125, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 925, provides that any person subject to the Code “who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex” commits sodomy. The accused was convicted of a violation of the article. Three grounds for dismissal of the charge are implicit in his appellate contentions. They are:(1) That Article 125 is unconstitutionally vague;(2) That the sexual act performed by him is conduct protected by a right of privacy assured by the Constitution; and(3) That if the…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Olmstead v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
  4. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. MarcumCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  2. Joseph G. Hatheway, Jr. v. Secretary of the ArmyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  3. United States v. HarrisUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
  4. United States v. McGuinnessUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. JohnsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API