Legal Opinion
United States v. Anati
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 20, 2006No. Docket No. 05-3800-crPublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The principal issue on this appeal is whether a district judge must provide a defendant with notice of intent to use the discretionary authority provided by United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), to impose, sua sponte, a non-Guidelines sentence and afford the defendant an opportunity to challenge the grounds for such a sentence. Henry Anati appeals from the July 12, 2005, judgment of the District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Sandra L. Townes, District Judge), sentencing him primarily to 60 months’ imprisonment for a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. Jerome CrosbyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Burns v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Carmine Fatico, and Daniel FaticoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Raymond RobinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Irizarry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- United States v. Vega-SantiagoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- United States v. AtencioCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. PereiraCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Mejia-HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.