Legal Opinion
McNett v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided August 6, 1993No. S-5212PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RABINO WITZ, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal is taken from the superior court’s denial of Nancy McNett’s application, made pursuant to Alaska Civil Rule 27, to perpetuate testimony before the filing of an action.
II. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS
On April 20, 1992, Nancy McNett filed a petition to depose Scott Cyr under Alaska Civil Rule 27(a). Cyr had been McNett’s supervisor during her employment at Alyeska Pipeline Service Company (Alyes-ka). In her petition, McNett stated that she intended to bring an action against Alyeska for breach of contract and wrongful termination, although…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richard A. Ash, on Behalf of Himself, and on Behalf of Bethelehem Steel Corporation v. Stewart S. Cort, and Bethlehem Steel Corporation, NominalCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
- In re FerkaufDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- In Re Burlington Bagel Bakery, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1988
- In re BolandDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1978
- In Re Gurnsey's PetitionDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Coulson v. Marsh & McLennan, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
- Monzingo v. Alaska Air Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005
- Bruner v. PetersenAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Stadnicky v. Southpark Terrace Homeowner's Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
- Moody-Herrera v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.