Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mathis v. McDonald

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided August 19, 2016No. 2015-7094Published

1Concurrence

HUGHES, Circuit Judge, with whom PROST, Chief Judge, LOURIE, O’MALLEY, TARANTO, and CHEN, Circuit Judges, join,

concurring in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc.

I concur in the denial of the petition for rehearing en banc but write separately to note the limited nature of the rebuttable presumption and emphasize the VA’s obligations to develop the record and to assist the veteran. Those duties ensure that a veteran will have access to information regarding a medical examiner’s credentials when appropriate. And if the VA fails to properly fulfill these obligations, its decisions…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. James P. Barr v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  2. Frances D'Aries v. James B. PeakeUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2008
  3. Ardison v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  4. Sickels v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
  5. Rizzo v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API