Legal Opinion

Real Estate Pros, P.C. v. Byars

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 2004No. 03-86PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KITE, Justice.

[¶ 1] Real Estate Pros, P.C. (Real Estate Pros) a real estate agency, shed Dr. James R. Byars, Jr. (Dr. Byars) for breach of an exclusive listing contract. After accepting an offer of settlement from Dr. Byars pursuant to Rule 68 of the Wyoming Rules of Civil Procedure, Real Estate Pros filed a motion for attorneys’ fees, which were provided for in the contract. The district court denied the motion, finding the offer, which stated it was “in full and final satisfaction of all claims of Plaintiffs against Defendant,” included Real Estate Pros’ claim for attorneys’ fees. We affirm.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dennis Webb, Sr. v. Dick James and Dick James Ford, Inc., a Corporation of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  3. Utility Automation 2000, Inc. v. Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Duffy v. BrownWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Nusom v. Comh Woodburn, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bumbal v. SmithColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. McCrary v. BiancoNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Robert W. Critchlow v. Dex Media West, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2016
  4. Dunham v. FullertonWyoming Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API