Legal Opinion

McCrary v. Bianco

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2006No. 40782PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Maupin, J.:

In this appeal, we clarify the cost-shifting provisions of NRCP 68 and NRS 17.115 concerning offers of judgments in civil cases. We hold that district courts must, where applicable and where the offer does not preclude such a comparison, include pre-offer prejudgment interest along with the principal judgment amount when comparing the judgment obtained and an offer of judgment in post-trial proceedings for relief under the rule and statute. We also hold that the district court properly excluded pre-offer attorney fees and costs in making its comparison below.

FACT…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Beattie v. ThomasNevada Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Bowyer v. TaackNevada Supreme Court · 1991
  3. First Interstate Bank of Nevada v. GreenNevada Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State Drywall, Inc. v. Rhodes Design & DevelopmentNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Mays v. TodaroNevada Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Public Employees' Benefits Program v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police DepartmentNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Albios v. Horizon Communities, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State Drywall, Inc. v. Rhodes Design & DevelopmentNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Gunderson v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Gunderson v. D.R. Horton, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API