Legal Opinion
Bumbal v. Smith
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 19, 2007No. 05CA0893PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TAUBMAN.
Plaintiff, Cindy Bumbal, appeals the order denying her request for attorney fees and costs against defendants, Christopher M. Smith, M.D., and Patrick J. Lillis, M.D., P.C., d/b/a Lake Loveland Dermatology (collectively Lake Loveland), after she accepted the defendants' offer of settlement. We affirm.
Lake Loveland cross-appealed, but we later granted the defendants' motion to its their cross-appeal.
In 2002, Bumbal filed suit against Lake Loveland asserting negligence and deceptive trade practices pursuant to the Colorado Consumer Protection Act (CCPA), § 6-1-101, et…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Ad Two, Inc. v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
- Dennis Webb, Sr. v. Dick James and Dick James Ford, Inc., a Corporation of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Utility Automation 2000, Inc. v. Choctawhatchee Electric Cooperative, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
- Crowe v. TullSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Kovac v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2017
- Montoya v. Connolly's Towing, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2008
- McGihon v. CaveColorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Ringquist v. Wall Custom Homes, LLCColorado Court of Appeals · 2007
- Catholic Health Initiatives Colorado v. City of PuebloColorado Court of Appeals · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.