Legal Opinion

Seay v. Allstate Insurance Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 19, 1982No. 8121SC1361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WELLS, Judge.

In the usual summary judgment situation, the burden is on the movant to show to the trial court that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the movant is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. Lowe v. Bradford, 305 N.C. 366, 289 S.E. 2d 363 (1982); Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343, 222 S.E. 2d 392 (1976). The procedure under the rule being designed to allow a preview or forecast of evidence or proof of the parties in order to determine whether a jury trial is necessary and to allow the trial court to “pierce the pleadings” to determine whether any genuine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Lowe v. BradfordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
  3. Patterson Ex Rel. Jones v. ReidCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  4. Stroup Sheet Metal Works, Inc. v. Heritage, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Murray v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estrada v. JaquesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  2. Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003
  3. Ramsey v. Keever's Used CarsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
  4. McKeel v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Dawkins v. FieldsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API