Legal Opinion

Dawkins v. Fields

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 7, 2003No. 25624Published

1Opinion of the Court

354 S.C. 58 (2003)

580 S.E.2d 433

Lamar W. DAWKINS and George W. Chisholm, Respondents,

v.

Richard E. FIELDS; Louis O. Dore; Margaret W. Lesesne, Personal Representative of the Estate of Theodore Lesesne; Mildred Bobo, Personal Representative of the Estate of William Bobo; Herbert A. DeCosta, Jr., Juanita J. Washington; Richard N. Whitney; R.M. Stiney, Jr.; James Vickers; Agatha Cooper; Harold Lesesne; DIA-Dick Realty Company; and Seaside Development Corporation, Petitioners.

No. 25624.

Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Heard January 23, 2003.

Decided April 7, 2003.

Rehearing Denied May 29, 2003.

Stephen…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Warren B. Sheinkopf v. John K.P. Stone Iii, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
  2. Baughman v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  3. Askanase v. FatjoCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  4. United States v. John SinclairCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  5. George v. FabriSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API