Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Hawks

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1932No. 511PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

Appellants, citizens and residents of Illinois, brought this suit to obtain protection by writ of injunction of their claimed ownership of a bridge across the South Canadian River at Purcell, Oklahoma, and their alleged right to charge and collect tolls from the public for its use. The river is the dividing line between McClain and Cleveland counties. The bridge was constructed as a toll bridge under franchises from those counties and was operated as a toll bridge. The ’issue raised by motions to dismiss is one of law, — whether the franchises had expired when the order…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Reagan v. Farmers' Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Poindexter v. GreenhowSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Cline v. Frink Dairy Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  5. Detroit v. Detroit Citizens' Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raynor v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1968
  2. PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF OK. v. Caddo Electric Coop.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
  3. Roadway Express, Inc. v. MurrayDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1932
  4. Mosheim v. RollinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  5. Opinion No. (2004), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API