Legal Opinion
PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF OK. v. Caddo Electric Coop.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 18, 1971No. 43769PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
The constitutionality of the Extension of Electric Service Act of 1961, 17 O.S.1961, Sections 158.1-158.6, inclusive, is under attack in this case upon the grounds hereinafter stated and discussed.
Section 158.1 of the Act provides:
“No supplier of electric service shall extend or render or offer to extend or render electric service to premises (a) already receiving such service from another supplier of electric service, or (b) not receiving such service and to which premises such service is available from the facilities of another supplier of electric service through an…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Frost v. Corporation Comm'n of Okla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Hawks v. HamillSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Ex Parte TindallSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Noble State Bank v. HaskellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Southern Disposal, Inc. v. Texas Waste ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Hargrave v. Canadian Valley Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Glenpool Utility Services Authority v. Creek County Rural Water District No. 2Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
- Rural Water Sewer & Solid Waste Management, District No. 1, Logan County v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
- State v. BezdicekCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.