Legal Opinion

Henson v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 24, 1949Published

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Latimer

Affirming,

This action was instituted by Cabel Arnold and W, S. Dunn, appellees, against E. B. Henson to recover a commission based upon an alleged contract, wherein they were to receive 3% as commission on the gross rental of a lease executed between the appellant as lessor and James Williams, Sr., and James Williams, Jr., lessees.

Upon trial of the cause below, judgment was entered in favor of plaintiffs. Defendant appeals advancing 4 reasons why the judgment of the lower court should be reversed: (1) Demurrer to the petition should have been sustained. (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Carter v. Hall & MartinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1921
  2. Womack v. DouglasCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Lowther v. ScheirichCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  4. Stuart-Mcknight Company v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  5. Nisbet v. DozierCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API