Legal Opinion
Lowther v. Scheirich
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Decided June 6, 1922PublishedCited by 10 opinions
Appeal from Franklin. Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Sampson
Affirming.
Appellant Lowther commenced this áction against Scheirich, Yantis, Stilz, Yancey, Hieatt, Brown, Johnson and Wiggins, to recover $20,000.00 alleged to be due him as commission on a sale of certain oil and gas leases situated in Jackson and Estill counties, Kentucky, belonging to Duquesne iOil Company, a Pennsylvania corporation, with offices in Pittsburg. A general demurrer was sustained -to his petition as amended, and upon his declining to further plead his cause was dismissed. Complaining of this, he appeals.
In his petition he set up and relied…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Beckett-Iseman Oil Co. v. BackerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Smith v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
- Bull v. McCreaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Combs v. CardwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
3Cited by10 opinions
- Union Gas & Oil Co. v. Wiedeman Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1924
- Gray-Mellon Oil Company v. FairchildCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Piney Oil Gas Company v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
- Lively v. Elkhorn Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1953
- Commonwealth v. Elkhorn Piney Coal Mining Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.