Legal Opinion
Williams v. Chrysler Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided January 7, 1998No. CIV.A. 97-68 MMSPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, Senior District Judge.
I. Introduction
Charles E. Williams (‘Williams”) instituted this action under Section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (“LMRA”), 29 U.S .C. § 185 (1978), against Chrysler Corporation (“Chrysler” or “Company”), the United Auto Workers (“UAW”) Local 1183, and the United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, UAW (collectively “the Unions”). Complaint, Docket Item (D.I.) 1. Plaintiff alleges that Chrysler, his former employer, wrongly discharged him in violation of the applicable collective bargaining…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Barbara R. Sheridan v. E.I. Dupont De Nemours and Company, Jacques AmblardCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Gans, Curtis, G. v. Mundy, James F. And the Law Firm of Raynes, McCarty Binder & MundyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Williams v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- In Re Cendant Corporation Prides LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2001
- Williams v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998