Legal Opinion
Williams v. Chrysler Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 16, 1998No. 98-7108PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GREENBERG, Circuit Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This appeal requires us to decide whether an untimely motion for reconsideration ad*185dressed to a union’s administrative body tolls the six-month statute of limitations for claims brought under section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185. After appellee Chrysler Corporation terminated him from his job, and his union refused to contest the termination in arbitration, appellant Charles Williams sought relief from the union’s disposition of his grievance through its internal appeal procedures as established…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- DelCostello v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Meral Smith v. Melvin H. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- John A. Hilfirty Martha L. Miller v. David C. Shipman Kenneth R. Schriner Brett O. Feese Stephen C. Schopfer Betty A. Noll. Martha MillerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Harris v. City of PhiladelphiaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kohn v. AT & T CORP.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1999
- Cupp v. Associates Consumer Discount Co. (In Re Cupp)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
- Ekemezie v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Ekemezie v. Cvs Pharmacy, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Williams v. Chrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998