Legal Opinion

State v. McIntosh

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 1970PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBranchfield, J.

Defendant and one Henry Joseph Gaskill were charged with the crime of knowingly uttering and publishing a forged cheek. They were found guilty, and defendant has appealed from the judgment of conviction.

•A social security check was issued, payable to defendant’s mother, but the mother died a few days prior to the receipt of the cheek. Defendant had been living with and caring for her mother. She had signed her inother’s name to social security cheeks numerous times, but always with her mother’s consent.

The day after the mother’s funeral defendant endorsed the check, using her mother’s name,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. HoffmanOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  3. State v. FlettOregon Supreme Court · 1963
  4. State v. KefferCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970
  5. State v. HammickCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. State v. McIntoshCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API