Cave Creek Unified School District v. Ducey
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
*345OPINION
BROWN, Judge.
¶ 1 In this opinion, we address whether a statute approved by Arizona’s voters in 2000, as part of Proposition 301, creates a binding obligation on the legislature to implement specific inflation adjustments to the annual budget for K-12 schools. See Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 15-901.01 (2012) (stating that “the legislature shall increase the base level or other components of the revenue control limit”). For reasons explained below, we hold that § 15-901.01 requires the legislature to provide for annual inflationary increases in each component of the…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- De Sylva v. BallentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Chevron Chemical Co. v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Hernandez v. FrohmillerArizona Supreme Court · 1949
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Cave Creek Unified School District v. DuceyArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- Az Public v. MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Canas v. Bay EntertainmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2021
- Transparent Payson v. Town of PaysonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2025
- Vangilder v. Pinal CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020